As said earlier in our Magazine, Validation and Recognitions are the most controversial parts of ECVET. It is simple to understand them: if we put in place all this assets and at the end of the day nobody is able to validate them properly and even though we are able to get in recognized nobody is going to understand the value of this, it is just time wasted.
Nevertheless these open questions and not clear points of the procedure should not discourage us to put ECVET in place for the next mobility. Opposite way round, this supposed to be stimulating. The reason why I am saying this is because if we do not have boundaries we can try, change, articulate, review, implement, create etc etc. We can actually try to implement the procedure as our best, according to our school needs personalizing as much as we can.
We can extend our view of mobility and adapt this tool to our needs.
My personal way to approach to this matter is: experimenting. That what we like also doing at ETN.
